Ampafrance SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Ampafrance SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• London Development Agency Act 2003
• Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (WSC) contra Boots- und Segelzubehör Walter Huber y Franz Attenberger.
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.



See all quotations

• Jean-Pierre Koubi v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Eurocool Logistik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• José Alejandro, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Koffiebranderij en Theehandel "Drie Mollen sinds 1818" BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Chef Revival USA Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• SABEL BV contra Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport.
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark
• Treaty establishing the European Community