Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• Greenham and Crookham Commons Act 2002
• Smith Kline & French Laboratories, Australia, and Menley & James, Australia, Act 1991
• Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.



See all quotations

• Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Institut für Lernsysteme GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Chef Revival USA Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark
• Treaty establishing the European Community