Elisabetta Dami v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Elisabetta Dami v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

This document cites

• London Local Authorities Act 2004
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Reemark Gesellschaft für Markenkooperation mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).



See all quotations

• Ellos AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• GE Betz Inc., formerly BetzDearborn Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Peek & Cloppenburg KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark