Joseph Stewart Celine v The State of Mauritius

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Darmalingum v Mauritius

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-1
• The Judicial Committee (Appellate Jurisdiction) Rules Order 2009

APPLIES

• Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 2001); R v J
• Boolell v The State

CITES

• Elaheebocus v The State of Mauritius
• Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 2001); R v J

CONSIDERED in

• R v Diayan Austin
• R v Diayan Austin
• Timothy Smith v R

[See more]

• Kemar Effs v R
• Kenneth Ronald Wyre v The Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
• Tommaso Barucca v Allied Health Professionals Council
• Kenneth Ronald Wyre v The Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
• Tommaso Barucca v Allied Health Professionals Council

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2013] 4 LRC 645
• [2012] NR Uned 144
• [2012] 1 WLR 3707

CITED in

• The Queen v Garvin St. Aimee
• The Queen v Ezra Isidore
• The Queen Claimant v Lance Blades Defendant [ECSC]

[See more]

• Rashid A. Pigott Appellant v The Queen Respondent

REFERRED in

• Rummun v State of Mauritius

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 2001); R v J
• Darmalingum v Mauritius
• Boolell v The State
• Elaheebocus v The State of Mauritius



See all quotations

• Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 2001); R v J