Jones v Padavatton

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Lancelot Shadwell v Cayley Shadwell and Another
• Parker v Clark

CONSIDERS

• Balfour v Balfour

APPLIED in

• Windle (A Bankrupt), Re, ex parte Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v The Bankrupt

CITED in

• Selen & Selen and Anor
• Magill v Magill (Attorney General intervening)
• Liu Zhong Bao v NSW Crime Commisssion

[See more]

• New Zealand Shipping Company Ltd v A. M. Satterthwaite & Company Ltd (Eurymedon)
• Smith v Mottley

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Evans v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs

REFERRED in

• Collier v Hollinshead and Another
• Placer Development Ltd v Commonwealth
• Rollerteam Ltd and Another v Linda Riley (by original action)

[See more]

• Gould v Gould
• Sonia Grant Claimant v Maynard Williams Defendant [ECSC]
• Hardwick v Johnson

FOLLOWED in

• Chonh Chai Fah; Phiong Khon

CONSIDERED in

• J.C. v W.C. (Specific Performance)
• Palinkas v Palinkas
• Xu v Shi and Another

[See more]

• Sion and Others v NSW Trustee and Guardian
• Kevin Rodney Jahnsen v Gary Alan Jahnsen
• Donelian v Donalian
• Maddalena Buono ((Plaintiff/First Cross Defendant)) v Porfirio Mazzella ((Defendant/Cross Claimant))
• Smilevska v Smilevska (No. 2)
• Voce v Deloraine
• Labracon Pty Ltd v Cuturich and Another
• Cacace v Bayside Operations Pty Ltd
• Toufic Laba Sarkis v Mahmoud Moussa
• Gray v Guardian Trust Australia
• Tanya Tadrous v Michael Tadrous
• Rose Ellen-Williamson: (Widow) (Plaintiff) (Appellant) Thomas Arthur Williamson and Ruth Williamson (married woman) (Defendants) (Respondents)
• Oleg Chvetsov (Claiman) v Alex Matuzny
• Chidiac v Maatouk
• Moore v Aubusson
• Sarant v Sarant
• A.M.G. Ferchal (Née Le Roy) v G. Ferchal (Formerly Vannod)
• Gray v Gray
• Webster v Strang; Steiner v Strang
• Darmanin v Cowan
• Magill v Magill
• Sean Richard Ormsby Lindsay v Jared Michael O'Loughnane
• C & F Finance Ltd Claimant v Petula Salmon
• Phillips et Al v Rodriguez
• Grant v Williams
• Gayadeen v Gayadeen et Al
• Smith v Mottley
• Richards v John
• Wendell Williams v Sharon Williams and Cornelius Arthar Richards
• May v Sahadeo et Al
• Colebrooke et Al v The National Insurance Board
• Paul Rey v Hugo Rey
• White v Mullings et Al
• Ward v Walsh, Bjerkham and Nature's Products Incorporated
• Christopher George Everett v Phillip Maynard
• Hanley v Martin
• Carmichael v Carmichael
• Carmichael v Carmichael
• Thomas Barry, Catherine Barry v Denis Barry
• Vernon Richards Claimant v Jacqueline John Defendant [ECSC]
• Paul Rey v Hugo Rey
• Watson v Ifill
• Bovaird v Frost
• Gordon v Gordon
• Ashton v Pratt (No 2)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1969] 2 All ER 616
• [1969] 1 WLR 328

DISTINGUISHED in

• Merritt v Merritt

This document cites

---

• Balfour v Balfour
• Lancelot Shadwell v Cayley Shadwell and Another
• Parker v Clark
• Jodla v Jodla
• Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949