Johnston v McKenzie

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• O'Malley v Brabazon
• Croghan v Maffeit

REFERS TO

• Goodfellow v Gray
• David v Rees
• Blakey v Latham

[See more]

• Edwards v Hope
• Hough v Edwards
• M'Cormack v Ross, Beatty, and Norman
• Ward v Haddrill
• Earl Russell v Countess Russell (Cross Appeal)

CONSIDERS

• Ex parte Cleland. Re Davies

CITES

• Bake v French
• Harrison v Harrison
• Stephens against Weston and Griffiths

[See more]

• Hall v Ody
• Greer v Young
• Scholey v Peck
• Cole v Eley
• Ross v Buxton
• Griffin against Eyles, Warden of the Fleet

FOLLOWS

• Dallow v Garrold

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1911] 2 IR 118

REFERRED in

• Duff v Tuite
• Re Blake

This document cites

• Earl Russell v Countess Russell (Cross Appeal)
• Bake v French
• Harrison v Harrison
• O'Malley v Brabazon
• Scholey v Peck



See all quotations

• Griffin against Eyles, Warden of the Fleet
• Goodfellow v Gray
• David v Rees
• Ex parte Cleland. Re Davies
• Hough v Edwards
• Greer v Young
• M'Cormack v Ross, Beatty, and Norman
• Cole v Eley
• Stephens against Weston and Griffiths
• Croghan v Maffeit
• Ward v Haddrill
• Ross v Buxton
• Hall v Ody
• Blakey v Latham
• Hassell v Stanley
• Dallow v Garrold
• Edwards v Hope
• Dallow v Garrold
• County Officers and Courts (Ireland) Act 1877
• Commons (Expenses) Act 1878
• Legal Practitioners (Ireland) Act 1876