John Charles v Llewellyn Skeete Supernumerary Constable

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Smith (Pauper) v Charles Baker and Sons
• Public Health Act 1875 - Articles : S-117
• Licensing Act 1872 - Articles : S-16

[See more]

• Administration of Justice Act 1960 - Articles : S-12
• Road Traffic Act 1930 - Articles : S-22
• Sheriffs Act 1887
• Vane v Yiannopoullos
• Ward v James
• R v Churchill (No 2)
• Lockyer v Gibb
• R v Winson
• Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
• Zimmerman v Grossman
• Farrell v Alexander
• Chisholm v Doulton
• R v Tolson
• Mitchell v Simpson
• R v Bishop
• Clarkson v Musgrave
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Commissioners of Police v Cartman
• Collman v Mills
• Coppen v Moore (No. 2)
• Parker v Alder
• Pearks, Gunston & Tee Ltd v Ward; Hennen v Southern Counties Dairies Company
• Lennon v Gibson & Howes Ltd
• Remmington v Larchin
• Frederick Braby & Company v Bedwell
• Barras v Aberdeen Steam Trawling and Fishing Company
• Liversidge v Anderson
• R v Jacobs
• Linnett v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
• Braithwaite & Company Ltd v Elliot
• Harding v Price
• Royal Crown Derby Porcelain Company Ltd v Raymond Russell
• Sambasivam v Public Prosecutor, Federation of Malaya
• Quality Dairies (York) Ltd v Pedley
• Gardner v Akeroyd
• Grimshaw v Dunbar
• James & Son Ltd v Smee
• Hobbs v Winchester Corporation
• Reynolds v G. H. Austin & Sons Ltd
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hinchy
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen

CITES

• Kammins Ballrooms Company Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd
• R v Churchill (No 2)
• Charman v Thomas

[See more]

• Commissioners of Police v Cartman
• Coppen v Moore (No. 2)
• Lockyer v Gibb
• Yeandel v Fisher
• R v Miller
• Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
• Ross v Rivenall
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hinchy
• Clarke v Bradlaugh
• Pearks, Gunston & Tee Ltd v Ward; Hennen v Southern Counties Dairies Company
• Chisholm v Doulton
• Brandish v Poole
• Re O. (Infants)
• Re Thornley, decd
• R v Coe
• Alphacell Ltd v Woodward
• R v St. Margaret's Trust Ltd
• Galloway v Galloway
• Farrell v Alexander
• John Hudson & Company, Ltd v Kirkness (HM Inspector of Taxes)
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
• Sweet v Parsley
• Re F. (orse. A.) (A Minor) (Publication of Information)
• R v Majewski
• Birkett v James
• Priddle v Fisher & Sons

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1978) 25 WIR 313

CITED in

• DPP' Reference No 2 of 1980
• Blackett v Callendar

CONSIDERED in

• Rolle v Attorney General
• Persaud v Ramsumeer

This document cites

• Alphacell Ltd v Woodward
• R v Coe
• R v Churchill (No 2)
• John Hudson & Company, Ltd v Kirkness (HM Inspector of Taxes)
• Vane v Yiannopoullos



See all quotations

• Re O. (Infants)
• Kammins Ballrooms Company Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd
• Grimshaw v Dunbar
• R v Miller
• Galloway v Galloway
• Birkett v James
• Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hinchy
• Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
• Ward v James
• Re F. (orse. A.) (A Minor) (Publication of Information)
• R v Churchill (No 2)
• Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
• Farrell v Alexander
• Farrell v Alexander
• R v Majewski
• Zimmerman v Grossman
• Barras v Aberdeen Steam Trawling and Fishing Company
• Liversidge v Anderson
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Hinchy
• Re Thornley, decd
• Sweet v Parsley
• Coppen v Moore (No. 2)
• Gardner v Akeroyd
• Mitchell v Simpson
• Harding v Price
• Coppen v Moore (No. 2)
• Royal Crown Derby Porcelain Company Ltd v Raymond Russell
• R v Winson
• Braithwaite & Company Ltd v Elliot