Joana Yaa Botwe v Johnson Anom Brifa

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Family Law Act 1986
• Family Law Act 1986 - Articles : S-55
• Family Law Act 1986

CONSIDERS

• Chaudhary v Chaudhary
• Asfana Lachaux v Bruno Lachaux

REFERS TO

• Wicken v Wicken
• Quazi v Quazi
• Alfonso-Brown v Milwood

[See more]

• H v H (The Queen's Proctor Intervening) (Validity of Japanese Divorce)
• H v S (Recognition of Overseas Divorce)
• Shelly Shu-Ling Liaw v San Chee Lee
• NA (Customary marriage and divorce – evidence)
• Olafisoye v Olafisoye
• *Lachaux v Independent Print Ltdlachaux v Evening Standard Ltd

CITES

• Chaudhary v Chaudhary

APPLIES

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2022] 1 FCR 567
• [2022] 1 FLR 784

This document cites

• Shelly Shu-Ling Liaw v San Chee Lee
• Asfana Lachaux v Bruno Lachaux
• Olafisoye v Olafisoye
• Chaudhary v Chaudhary
• Alfonso-Brown v Milwood



See all quotations

• Quazi v Quazi
• NA (Customary marriage and divorce – evidence)
• H v H (The Queen's Proctor Intervening) (Validity of Japanese Divorce)
• Wicken v Wicken
• H v S (Recognition of Overseas Divorce)
• Chaudhary v Chaudhary
• Family Law Act 1986
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)