James v South Australia

Afetações

REFERS TO

• British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique

CONSIDERS

• Cox and Others v The Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Councillors of the City of London
• Spooner and Another v Juddow (Widow)

REPORTED OPINION OF by

• 40 CLR 1
• 33 Arg LR 334

DISTINGUISHED by

• Commissioner of Police v Sleiman & Avs Group of Companies Pty Ltd

CITED NEUTRAL by

• Primary Securities Ltd v Saker
• Gersten v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• Nikolic v Mgica Ltd

[Veja Mais]

• O’Flaherty v City of Sydney Council
• Attorney-General (Nsw) v Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia
• Weston v Publishing and Broadcasting Ltd
• Paul Gerard Weston in his capacity as Special Purpose Liquidator of One.Tel Ltd (in Liquidation) v Peter John Macourt

CONSIDERED by

• James v Cowan
• Wilcox Mofflin Ltd v New South Wales
• Uebergang v Australian Wheat Board

REFERRED by

• R v Vizzard; ex parte Hill
• Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales
• Barley Marketing Board (Nsw) v Norman

[Veja Mais]

• Roughley v New South Wales; ex parte Beavis
• James v Commonwealth
• Ex parte Nelson
• Hughes and Vale Proprietary Ltd v New South Wales
• Croome v Tasmania
• Re McBain

Documentos citados

• Cox and Others v The Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Councillors of the City of London
• Spooner and Another v Juddow (Widow)
• British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique