Interpretation step zero: a limit on methodology as 'law'.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 448 U.S. 1 (1980), 79-838, Maine v. Thiboutot
• Federal Cases - 451 U.S. 1 (1981), 79-1404, Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
• Federal Cases - 489 U.S. 803 (1989), 87-1020, Davis v. Michigan Department of the Treasury
• Federal Cases - 529 U.S. 120 (2000), 98-1152, FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
• Federal Cases - 542 U.S. 507 (2004), 03-6696, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 546 U.S. 142 (2005), 04-881, Lockhart v. United States
• Federal Cases - 185 U.S. 83 (1902), 317, Rodgers v. United States
• Federal Cases - 109 U.S. 556 (1883), Ex Parte Kan-gi-shun-ca
• Federal Cases - 323 U.S. 214 (1944), 22, Korematsu v. United States
• Federal Cases - 327 U.S. 711 (1946), 123, Williams v. United States
• Federal Cases - 349 U.S. 302 (1955), 145, Marcello v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
• Arizona - 683 P.2d 743 (Ariz. 1984), 6105, State v. Pena
• Arizona - 683 P.2d 744 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1983), 1 CA-CR 6243, State v. Pena
• California - 2 Cal.3d 619, 7853, Keeler v. Superior Court
• Illinois - 22 N.E. 288 (Ill. 1889), People ex rel. Hunt v. National Savings Bank
• Ohio - 428 N.E.2d 428 (Ohio 1981), 80-1590, State v. Wac
• Ohio - 637 N.E.2d 16 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. 1993), C-920870, State v. Ward
• Oregon Caselaw - 171 P.3d 361 (Or. 2007), S.C. S53096, State v. Rutley
• Oregon Caselaw - 206 P.3d 1042 (Or. 2009), S055031, State v. Gaines
• Connecticut - 668 A.2d 682 (Conn. 1995), 15155, State v. Denby
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties