Insuring the knot: the Massachusetts approach to postnuptial agreements.

This document cites

• Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 19/2005 of 8 February 2005 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement
• New York - Crane v. Crane, 9440N.
• California - In re Marriage of Mehren & Dargan, G032291.
• Pennsylvania - Laub v. Laub
• Ohio - Brewsaugh v. Brewsaugh



See all quotations

• Massachusetts - Fogg v. Fogg
• Massachusetts - Upham v. Upham, 92-P-1461
• Massachusetts - Welch v. King
• North Carolina - Motley v. Motley, 593
• Indiana - Flansburg v. Flansburg
• Pennsylvania - Stoner v. Stoner
• Florida - Posner v. Posner
• Utah - D'Aston v. D'Aston
• Wisconsin - Greenwald v. Greenwald
• Arizona - Harber's Estate, In re, 8572
• Massachusetts - Rosenberg v. Lipnick
• Massachusetts - Dominick v. Dominick
• Massachusetts - Bradford v. Parker
• Massachusetts - deCastro v. deCastro
• Michigan - Muxlow's Estate, In re
• Arkansas - LeFevers v. LeFevers, 5--3849
• California - Diosdado v. Diosdado
• Tennessee - Bratton v. Bratton
• New Hampshire - MacFarlane v. Rich
• California - In re Marriage of Delaney
• South Dakota - Estate of Gab, Matter of
• Florida - Robbat v. Robbat
• California - Marriage of Bonds, In re
• Alabama - Tibbs v. Anderson
• Massachusetts - Kovler v. Vagenheim
• Colorado - Lopata's Estate, In re
• Pennsylvania - Simeone v. Simeone
• Federal Cases - Griswold v. State of Connecticut
• Colorado - Newman v. Newman
• Massachusetts - Wellington v. Rugg