Initiative and referendum: the trials of direct democracy.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 955 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir. 1992), 89-15771, Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Fair Political Practice Com'n
• Federal Cases - 747 F.Supp. 580 (E.D.Cal. 1990), CIV. S-89-433, Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Fair Political Practices Com'n
• Federal Cases - 505 U.S. 833 (1992), Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
• Federal Cases - 514 U.S. 779 (1995), 93-1456, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
• Federal Cases - 517 U.S. 620 (1996), 94-1039, Romer v. Evans



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 223 U.S. 118 (1912), 36, Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Oregon
• Federal Cases - 48 U.S. 1 (1849), Luther v. Borden
• Federal Cases - 369 U.S. 186 (1962), 6, Baker v. Carr
• Federal Cases - 420 U.S. 714 (1975), 73-1452, Oregon v. Hass
• Arkansas - 872 S.W.2d 349 (Ark. 1994), 93-1240, United States Term Limits, Inc. v. Hill
• California - 18 Cal.3d 582, 23222, Associated Home Builders etc., Inc. v. City of Livermore
• California - 22 Cal.3d 584, 23682, Hawkins v. Superior Court
• California - 48 Cal.3d 805, S007838, Calfarm Ins. Co. v. Deukmejian
• California - 51 Cal.3d 744, S012016, Taxpayers To Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Pol. Practices Com.
• California - 52 Cal.3d 336, S016137, Raven v. Deukmejian
• California - 54 Cal.3d 26, S014984, Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & Ross
• California - 1 Cal.4th 36, S019774, Bowens v. Superior Court
• California - 6 Cal.4th 707, S025815, Gerken v. Fair Political Practices Com.
• California - 9 Cal.4th 688, S035265, Rossi v. Brown
• California - 9 Cal.4th 763, S037642, DeVita v. County of Napa
• Colorado - 882 P.2d 1335 (Colo. 1994), 94SA48, Evans v. Romer
• Florida - 644 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1994), 83969, Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Tax Limitation
• Illinois - 641 N.E.2d 525 (Ill. 1994), 77405, Chicago Bar Ass'n v. Illinois State Bd. of Elections
• Kentucky - 884 S.W.2d 641 (Ky. 1994), 93-SC-360, Wilson v. Kentucky Transp. Cabinet
• North Dakota - 522 N.W.2d 426 (N.D. 1994), 940068, Bolinske v. North Dakota State Fair Ass'n
• Montana - 877 P.2d 486 (Mont. 1994), 93-657, Nicholson v. Cooney
• New Jersey - 391 A.2d 911 (N.J. 1978), White v. North Bergen Tp.
• New Jersey - 853 A.2d 856 (N.J. 2004), Lance v. McGreevey
• Nevada - 839 P.2d 120 (Nev. 1992), 23517, Stumpf v. Lau
• Nevada - 141 P.3d 1224 (Nev. 2006), 47620, Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Heller
• Oklahoma - 109 P. 558 (Okla. 1910), Threadgill v. Cross
• Oregon Caselaw - 74 P. 710 (Or. 1903), Kadderly v. City of Portland
• Oregon Caselaw - 99 P. 427 (Or. 1909), State v. Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
• Oklahoma - 838 P.2d 1 (Okla. 1992), 76437, In re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642
• Oklahoma - 142 P.3d 400 (Okla. 2006), O-103,021, In re Initiative Petition No. 382