Ingenious Games LLP; Inside Track Productions LLP; Ingenious Film Partners 2 LLP

Core Citations

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2016] TC 05270

REFERRED in

• Ingenious Games LLP v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”)

This document cites

• Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons (Ont.) et al., (1992) 57 O.A.C. 115 (CA)
• Griffiths v J. P. Harrison (Watford) Ltd
• Lupton v F.A. & A.B. Ltd
• MacNiven v Westmoreland Investments Ltd
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Carrick and Carrick



See all quotations

• Odeon Associated Theatres Ltd v Jones
• Pickersgill v Motley; Ransom v Higgs; Lees and another v Grant; Dickinson v Downes; Kilmorie (Aldridge) Ltd v Dickinson
• Ramsay (W T) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Beauchamp v F. W. Woolworth Plc
• Chinn v Hochstrasser ; Chinn (A E) v Collins (Inspector of Taxes)
• National Westminster Bank Plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd and Others
• Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
• Ensign Tankers (Leasing) Ltd v Stokes
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Duke of Westminster
• Cooper v Billingham (Inspector of Taxes). ; Fisher v Edwards (Inspector of Taxes)
• Antoniades v Villiers ; AG Securities v Vaughan
• Mountney v Treharne
• Ensign Tankers (Leasing) Ltd v Stokes
• Threlfall v Jones (Inspector of Taxes) ; Gallagher v Same
• Weiner v Harris
• Vodafone Cellular Ltd and Others v Shaw (Inspector of Taxes)
• Potts' Executors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Marson v Morton
• Ensign Tankers (Leasing) Ltd v Stokes
• TC03545: Acornwood LLP and related appeals
• Re H. P. C. Productions Ltd
• Peterson v Inland Revenue Commissioner (New Zealand)
• Clarke v British Telecom Pension Scheme Trustees
• Pooley v Driver
• Partners of the Vaccine Research Ltd Partnership and Anor
• Degorce
• Patel
• Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v HM Revenue and Customs
• Samarkand Film Partnership No.3 v HM Revenue and Customs
• Aspect Capital Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners