Summary
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Extract
Criminal law - inconclusive DNA test results admitted as relevant evidence despite absence of random match probability analysis - Commonwealth v. Mattei.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 293 F. 1013 (D.D.C. 1923), 3968, Frye v. United States
- Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 92-102, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
- Alaska - 18 P.3d 1224 (Alaska App. 2001), A-7239, Peters v. State
- Arizona - 933 P.2d 1187 (Ariz. 1997), CR-95-0100, State v. Hummert
- Arizona - 933 P.2d 1197 (Ariz. 1997), State v. Boles