Impax Labs., Inc. v. Lannett Holdings Inc.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - Viiv Healthcare Uk Ltd. v. Lupin Ltd.
• Federal Cases - Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.
• Federal Cases - KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
• Federal Cases - Graham v. John Deere Co.
• Federal Cases - Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Ruiz v. A.B. Chance Company
• Federal Cases - Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.
• Federal Cases - Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa
• Federal Cases - Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc. (In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litig.), Appeal No. 2011-1399
• Federal Cases - Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
• Federal Cases - Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Appeal No. 2011-1619
• Federal Cases - ABRAXIS BIOSci. INC. v. NAVINTA LLC.
• Federal Cases - Ortho-Mcneil Pharmaceutical v. Mylan Labs.
• Federal Cases - Diversitech Corp. v. Century Steps, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Atofina v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp.
• Federal Cases - W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., s. 83-613
• Federal Cases - Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharms. United States, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Advanced Display Systems v. Kent State Univ.
• Federal Cases - Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corp.
• Federal Cases - Net Moneyin, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Drilling USA, Inc.
• US - Reference Stubs - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter
• US - Reference Stubs - Presumption of validity; defenses
• US - Reference Stubs - Conditions for patentability; novelty