IM Properties Development Ltd v Lichfield District Council (1) Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd (1st Interested Party) (2) Persimmon Homes Ltd (2nd Interested Party)
Linked as:
Extract
IM Properties Development Ltd v Lichfield District Council (1) Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd (1st Interested Party) (2) Persimmon Homes Ltd (2nd Interested Party)
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
APPLIES
CITES
- Cogent Land Llp (Claimant) Rochford District Council (Defendant) Bellway Homes Ltd (Interested Party)
- Berkeley v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions and Another
- Copas and Another v Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead
[See more]
CONSIDERS
- Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Gallagher Estates Ltd and Another
- Berkeley v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions and Another
REFERS TO
CONSIDERS
- Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 - Articles : S-113
- Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 - Articles : S-20
- Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 - Articles : S-17
[See more]
This document cites
- Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Hopkins Developments Ltd
- Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Gallagher Estates Ltd and Another
- Calverton Parish Council v Nottingham City Council and Others Peveril Securities Ltd and Another (Interested Parties)
- Heard v Broadland District Council and Others
- I.M. Properties Development Ltd v Lichfield District Council Taylor Wimpey (UK) Ltd and Another (Interested Parties)
