Ibrahim b Mohamad v Ketua Polis Daerah Johor Bahru & 3 Ors

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Vine v National Dock Labour Board
• Abbott v Sullivan
• Barnard v National Dock Labour Board

[See more]

• Cooper v Wilson
• Abbott v Sullivan
• Jungheim, Hopkins & Company v Foukelmann
• Oakland Metal Company Ltd v D. Benaim & Company Ltd
• Oil Products Trading Company, Ltd v Société Anonyme Société de Gestion D'Entreprises Coloniales
• Vine v National Dock Labour Board

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Suppuletchimi a/p Karpaya v Palmco Bina Sdn Bhd

REFERS TO

• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No. 3)
• Davey v Bentinck
• Hampshire County Council v Shonleigh Nominees Ltd

[See more]

• Lindsay Petroleum Company v Hurd
• Miller-Mead v Minister of Housing and Local Government
• Smith v Harris
• Robinson v Alnwick (Owners); The Alnwick
• The Gniezno
• The Llandovery Castle

FOLLOWS

• Kumpulan Kertas Niaga Sdn Bhd and Another; New Straits Times (M) Bhd
• Riches v DPP
• Eshah bte Sa'at v Meriam bte Sa'at and Others

[See more]

• Abdul Razak Ahmad v Majlis Bandaraya Johor Bahru
• Tio Chee Hing v Government of Sabah
• Wenlock v Moloney
• Raja Zainal Abidin Bin Raja Haji Tachik v British American Life & General Insurance Bhd
• Moorgate Mercantile Company Ltd v Twitchings
• Karpal Singh and Another v PP
• Land Executive Committee of Federal Territory v Syarikat Harper Gilfillan Bhd
• Republic of Peru v Peruvian Guano Company
• DPP v Richey
• Dyson v Attorney General
• Gan Hay Chong v Siow Kian Yuh and Another
• Datuk Haji Mohamed bin Yaacob and Others; Haji Hussin bin Haji AH and Others v; and connected cases
• Abdul Razak Ahmad v Majlis Bandaraya Johor Bahru
• Abu Bakar bin Haji Yusuf v Mohamed Hamzah bin Hanapiah and Another
• Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v London and North Western Railway Company

REFERRED in

• Tetuan SP Chanra v NME Service Sdn Bhd
• EON Bank Bhd v Gandarama Sdn Bhd
• Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad v Zulpadli bin Mohammad

[See more]

• Salutary Avenue (M) Sdn Bhd v Malaysia Shipyard and Engineering Sdn Bhd and Another
• Norzian bt Joya and Others v Kamizah bt Joya and Others

FOLLOWED in

• Mahendar a/p Sucha Singh v Emile Joseph (Penyelesai Ipoh Road Indian Co-operative Housing Society
• Goh Joon v Kerajaan Negeri Johor and Others
• Mohamed Yusop b Abdul Wahab v American Express (M) Sdn Bhd

DISTINGUISHED in

• Umas Sdn Bhd v RHB Bank Bhd and Another
• Nusky Realty Sdn Bhd v Ong Lai @ Ong Kong Lai and Another and Another Case

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1996] 2 AMR 1964
• [1996] 5 MLJ 15

This document cites

• Riches v DPP
• Vine v National Dock Labour Board
• Wenlock v Moloney
• Barnard v National Dock Labour Board
• Moorgate Mercantile Company Ltd v Twitchings



See all quotations

• Vine v National Dock Labour Board
• Miller-Mead v Minister of Housing and Local Government
• DPP v Richey
• Robinson v Alnwick (Owners); The Alnwick
• Raja Zainal Abidin Bin Raja Haji Tachik v British American Life & General Insurance Bhd
• Abbott v Sullivan
• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No. 3)
• Datuk Haji Mohamed bin Yaacob and Others; Haji Hussin bin Haji AH and Others v; and connected cases
• Tio Chee Hing v Government of Sabah
• Dyson v Attorney General
• Hampshire County Council v Shonleigh Nominees Ltd
• Attorney General of the Duchy of Lancaster v London and North Western Railway Company
• The Llandovery Castle
• Eshah bte Sa'at v Meriam bte Sa'at and Others
• Jungheim, Hopkins & Company v Foukelmann
• Cooper v Wilson
• Republic of Peru v Peruvian Guano Company
• Gan Hay Chong v Siow Kian Yuh and Another
• Kumpulan Kertas Niaga Sdn Bhd and Another; New Straits Times (M) Bhd
• Suppuletchimi a/p Karpaya v Palmco Bina Sdn Bhd
• Oakland Metal Company Ltd v D. Benaim & Company Ltd
• Land Executive Committee of Federal Territory v Syarikat Harper Gilfillan Bhd
• Abu Bakar bin Haji Yusuf v Mohamed Hamzah bin Hanapiah and Another
• Abdul Razak Ahmad v Majlis Bandaraya Johor Bahru
• The Gniezno
• Abbott v Sullivan
• Abdul Razak Ahmad v Majlis Bandaraya Johor Bahru
• Davey v Bentinck
• Oil Products Trading Company, Ltd v Société Anonyme Société de Gestion D'Entreprises Coloniales
• Smith v Harris