Hughes v Clewley (Siben)

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Hughes v Clewley (Siben)

CONSIDERS

• Merchant Shipping Act 1894 - Articles : S-30
• Merchant Shipping Act 1854 - Articles : S-65
• Merchant Shipping Act 1854 - Articles : S-62

[See more]

• Merchant Shipping Act 1854 - Articles : S-63
• Merchant Shipping Act 1854 - Articles : S-64
• Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Price
• Roy v Hamiltons & Company
• McPhail v Hamilton

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• NCNB Texas National Bank v Evensong Company Ltd (Mikado)

REVERSES

• Hughes v Clewley (Siben)

REFERS TO

• R v Chard
• Barras v Aberdeen Steam Trawling and Fishing Company

CITES

• Compagnie Chemin de Fer Paris Orleans v Leeston Shipping Company
• Hulton v Hulton
• Spence v Crawford

FOLLOWS

• La Blanca and El Argentino, The

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 420
• [1994] JLR 227

This document cites

• R v Chard
• Spence v Crawford
• Barras v Aberdeen Steam Trawling and Fishing Company
• Roy v Hamiltons & Company
• Hulton v Hulton



See all quotations

• Beaman v A.R.T.S. Ltd
• Compagnie Chemin de Fer Paris Orleans v Leeston Shipping Company
• Beneficial Finance Corporation Ltd v Price
• La Blanca and El Argentino, The
• Hughes v Clewley (Siben)
• NCNB Texas National Bank v Evensong Company Ltd (Mikado)
• McPhail v Hamilton