Hudson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• James v Greenwich London Borough Council

REFERS TO

• Confederation of Passenger Transport UK v The Humber Bridge Board (Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, interested party)
• Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Company Ltd

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Hudson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

CITES

• James v Greenwich London Borough Council

REVERSES

• Hudson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

CONSIDERS

• The Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) (Amendment) Regulations 2008
• Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002
• Employment Act 2002 - Articles : S-45

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2013] 1 All ER 1370
• [23/01/2013] TLR 1
• [2013] IRLR 32

[See more]

• [2012] WLR D 312
• [2013] ICR 329

REFERRED in

• SBT Star Bulk & Tankers (Germany) GmbH & Company KG v Cosmotrade SA (m/v Wehr Trave)
• Khanty-Mansiysk Recoveries Ltd v Forsters LLP

This document cites

• James v Greenwich London Borough Council
• Litster v Forth Dry Dock and Engineering Company Ltd
• Confederation of Passenger Transport UK v The Humber Bridge Board (Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, interested party)
• Hudson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• James v Greenwich London Borough Council



See all quotations

• Employment Act 2002
• Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002
• Education Act 2002 (Commencement No. 1)Order 2002
• Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work