Howe v Kavanaugh

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 - Articles : S-7
• Allen v Tunbridge
• Clarke v Stanford

[See more]

• Armstrong v Ogle
• Gilbert v McKay

DISTINGUISHES

• Griffin v Grey Coaches

REFERS TO

• Case v Storey
• Peers v Needham

CONSIDERED in

• Chorley Borough Council v Harold Edward Thomas
• DPP v Computer Cab Company Ltd and (First Respondent) John Baughan, Victor Hall, George Hall, Alan Green & James Tindall (Second Respondents)
• Gateshead Council v Paul Henderson

[See more]

• Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Arif
• The Queen v British Airports Authority and Another
• R United Trade Action Group Ltd v Transport for London

CLARIFIED in

• Bassam v Green

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1959] 2 All ER 313
• [1959] 2 WLR 781
• [1959] 2 QB 311

APPLIED in

• Rose v Welbeck Motors Ltd
• Saint Lucia air and Seaports Authority Appellant v [1] Leroy Mathurin [2] Wayne Albertson Respondent [ECSC]

REFERRED in

• R United Trade Action Group Ltd v Transport for London
• Reading Borough Council v Mudassar Ali

This document cites

• Peers v Needham
• Case v Storey
• Clarke v Stanford
• Gilbert v McKay
• Armstrong v Ogle



See all quotations

• Griffin v Grey Coaches
• Allen v Tunbridge
• Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869