Howarth v Howarth

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Stuart v Stuart & Holden
• Apted v Apted and Bliss
• White v White

[See more]

• Pretty v Pretty
• Hunter v Hunter
• Brooke v Brooke
• Holland v Holland
• Blunt v Blunt
• Roche v Roche
• Bainbridge v Bainbridge
• North v North
• Hampson v Hampson

APPROVES

• Chetwynd-Talbot v Chetwynd-Talbot

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970 - Articles : S-18
• Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - Articles : S-62
• Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - Articles : S-76

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] 3 All ER 164
• [1963] 107 SJ 554
• [1963] 3 WLR 551

[See more]

• [1964] P 6

REFERRED in

• Rudman v Rudman and Lee
• Ponnudurai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Husaini

[See more]

• Re Barrell Enterprises

CONSIDERED in

• Bull v Bull
• Kathleen Clarke (Petitioner) Raymond Clarke (Respondent) Pamela Clarke (Intervener) Albert Fellingham (Party cited)

This document cites

• North v North
• Holland v Holland
• Bainbridge v Bainbridge
• Blunt v Blunt
• Stuart v Stuart & Holden



See all quotations

• Brooke v Brooke
• Hunter v Hunter
• Hampson v Hampson
• White v White
• Apted v Apted and Bliss
• Roche v Roche
• Pretty v Pretty
• Chetwynd-Talbot v Chetwynd-Talbot