Hood v Hood

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Winans and Another v Attorney-General (on Behalf of HM)
• Sim v Sim
• Hutter v Hutter

[See more]

• Perrin v Perrin; Powell v Powell
• De Gasquet James (Countess) v Mecklenburg-Schwerin (Duke)
• Chichester v The Marques and Marchiones of Donegall
• Whitcomb against Whitcomb
• Williams against Dormer, Falsely called Williams
• SPROULE v HOPKINS [K. B. Div Matrimonial.]
• Bell v Bell
• Mason v Mason (Otherwise Pennington)
• Collett against Collett

REFERS TO

• Anghinelli v Anghinelli
• Raeburn v Raeburn
• Milligan v Milligan

DOES NOT APPLY

• Addison (otherwise McAllister) v Addison
• Yelverton v Yelverton
• Eustace v Eustace

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1959] IR 225 (Digest)
• [1959] IR 225

This document cites

• Winans and Another v Attorney-General (on Behalf of HM)
• Bell v Bell
• Addison (otherwise McAllister) v Addison
• Anghinelli v Anghinelli
• Hurley v Wimbush, Re Sillar



See all quotations

• Keymer v Reddy
• Perrin v Perrin; Powell v Powell
• Williams against Dormer, Falsely called Williams
• Chichester v The Marques and Marchiones of Donegall
• Whitcomb against Whitcomb
• Eustace v Eustace
• Johnston v Cooke
• Re Joyce; Corbet v Fagan
• Collett against Collett
• Mason v Mason (Otherwise Pennington)
• De Gasquet James (Countess) v Mecklenburg-Schwerin (Duke)
• Yelverton v Yelverton
• Milligan v Milligan
• Raeburn v Raeburn
• Sim v Sim
• Hutter v Hutter
• SPROULE v HOPKINS [K. B. Div Matrimonial.]
• Courts of Justice Act, 1924