Holmes v Holmes

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Quazi v Quazi

APPLIES

• Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd

RELIES UPON

• De Dampierre v de Dampierre

DISTINGUISHES

• W v W (Financial Provision)

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 - Articles : S-13
• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 - Articles : S-16
• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984

[See more]

• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-30

CONSIDERED in

• Z v Z (Foreign Divorce: Financial Provision)
• Jordan v Jordan
• Lamagni v Lamagni

[See more]

• M v L (Financial Relief After Overseas Divorce)
• AKR v S Phcak
• Hewitson v Hewitson
• Olusola Akinnoye Agbaje v Sikirat Abeni Akinnoye Agbaje
• M.R v P.R (Relief After Foreign Divorce)

APPLIED in

• N v N (Foreign Divorce: Financial Relief)

REFERRED in

• Traversa v Freddi (Part III application following Italian divorce)
• Akinnoye-Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje
• Zimina v Zimin

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1989] 2 FLR 364
• [1990] Fam CR 157
• [1989] 3 All ER 786

[See more]

• [1989] FAM 47
• [1989] 3 WLR 302

APPROVED in

• Akinnoye-Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje

CITED in

• Harjit Kaur d/o Kulwant Singh v Saroop Singh a/l Amar Singh

This document cites

---

• De Dampierre v de Dampierre
• Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
• Quazi v Quazi
• W v W (Financial Provision)
• Law of Property Act 1925



See all quotations

• Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984