Hoholm v Government of Norway
Linked as:
Extract
Hoholm v Government of Norway
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
- Extradition Act 2003 - Articles : S-103
CONSIDERED in
- Edgars Veiss v Le Paelite Prosecutor General Office Republic of Latvia
- Kamil Krajewski v Circuit Court of Torun, Poland (First Respondent) Regional Court of Bydgoszvz, Poland (Second Respondent)
- Viorel Beretki v Harghita Law Court Romania
[See more]
CITED in
- Marek Polkowski v District Court in Kalisz, Poland (A Polish Judicial Authority)
- Steven Woodbridge v The Head Attorney General of the District of Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Danut Maris v Romanian Judicial Authority
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
REFERRED in
- Prezemyslaw Piwonia v District Court, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
- Satkunas v Prosecutor Generals Office of Republic of Lithuania
- Octavian Radu v The Vaslui Court of Law, Romania
REPORTED OPINION OF in
APPLIED in
This document cites
- Barrow v Bankside Members Agency Ltd and Another
- Norris v Government of the United States of America
- Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
- Szombathely City Court (and two other Hungarian Judicial Authorities) v Ronald Fenyvesi and Kalman Fenyvesi [Administrative Court]
- Kalniets v District Court of Ogre, Latvia [Administrative Court]
