Hine v Hine

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Short v Short
• Allen v Allen

APPLIES

• Rimmer v Rimmer
• Re Roger's Question
• Cobb v Cobb

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

DISTINGUISHED in

• Chapman v Chapman

FOLLOWED in

• Chin Shak Len v Lin Fan

CONSIDERED in

• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Francois v Francois
• Johnson (Sanida) v Clark (Roan)

[See more]

• Stephenson (Robert) v Anderson (Carmelita)
• Scatliffe v Scatliffe
• Bedson v Bedson
• Vidrine v Vidrine
• Proverbs v Proverbs
• Jenifer Jacinth Carty v Oral Curtis Carty
• Hill v Hill
• Tyson v Tyson et Al
• Haynes v Berry
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Paul Michael Davis (as trustee in bankruptcy of Audley Glendon Jackson) v Audley Glendon Jackson and Another
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).
• Carey v Carey
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Hill v Hill

REFERRED in

• Nixon v Nixon
• Bernard v Josephs
• Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland

[See more]

• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Stack v Dowden

CITED in

• Llewellyn Tittle v Virgina Tittle
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Wyatt v Wyatt

[See more]

• Henry v Henry
• B.L. v M.L.

DOUBTED in

• Goodman v Gallant

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Pqr (Mw) v Str

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1962] 3 All ER 345
• [1962] 1 WLR 1124

APPLIED in

• Wilson v Wilson
• Jardine v Jardine

This document cites

---

• Short v Short
• Allen v Allen
• Cobb v Cobb
• Rimmer v Rimmer
• Re Roger's Question



See all quotations

• Married Women's Property Act 1882