Hill v Bailey

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Lockley v National Blood Transfusion Service
• Lowsley v Forbes (t/a L.E. Design Services)
• Times Newspapers Ltd v Chohan

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Hill v Bailey

REVERSES

• Hill v Bailey

CONSIDERS

• Access to Justice Act 1999 - Articles : S-11
• Legal Aid Act 1988 - Articles : S-17
• Access to Justice Act 1999

[See more]

• Legal Aid Act 1988 - Articles : S-18
• Legal Aid Act 1988
• Limitation Act 1980 - Articles : S-24

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [05/01/2004] TLR 2
• [2004] 1 All ER 121

CONSIDERED in

• R (Burkett) v Hammersmith and Fulham London BC
• Ben Hashem v Al Shayif

This document cites

• Times Newspapers Ltd v Chohan
• Lockley v National Blood Transfusion Service
• Lowsley v Forbes (t/a L.E. Design Services)
• Hill v Bailey
• Access to Justice Act 1999



See all quotations

• Legal Aid Act 1988
• Limitation Act 1980
• Community Legal Service (Costs) Regulations 2000
• Civil Legal Aid (General) Regulations 1989