Hickman (Née Norton) v Hickman

Core Citations

DISAPPROVES

• A.C. Gallie Ltd v Davies and Walker
• Jersey Demolition Contractors Ltd v Resources Recovery Board

CITES

• Unilever Computer Services Ltd v Tiger Leasing S.A. (Practice Note)
• Atwood v Chichester
• Holderness (née Waring) v Holderness and Crann [CA (Jersey)]

[See more]

• Taylor (née Hayter) v Taylor

COMMENTS

• Revici v Prentice Hall Incorporated

APPLIES

• Palata Investments Ltd v Burt & Sinfield Ltd
• Ratnam v Cumarasamy
• Van Stillevoldt (C. M.) B.v v E.L. Carriers Inc.

FOLLOWS

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Gatti v Shoosmith

CONSIDERED in

• De Freitas v Citadel Trust
• Glazebrook v Housing Committee of The States of Jersey

CITED in

• AG v Heath and Louis

DISTINGUISHED in

• R.C. De Gruchy and P.A. De Gruchy (Née Bower) v Planning and Environment Committee

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1987] JLR 602

This document cites

• Revici v Prentice Hall Incorporated
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Van Stillevoldt (C. M.) B.v v E.L. Carriers Inc.
• Holderness (née Waring) v Holderness and Crann [CA (Jersey)]
• Gatti v Shoosmith



See all quotations

• Jersey Demolition Contractors Ltd v Resources Recovery Board
• Jersey Demolition Contractors Ltd v Resources Recovery Board
• Taylor (née Hayter) v Taylor
• A.C. Gallie Ltd v Davies and Walker
• Palata Investments Ltd v Burt & Sinfield Ltd
• Atwood v Chichester
• Ratnam v Cumarasamy
• Unilever Computer Services Ltd v Tiger Leasing S.A. (Practice Note)