Heath v Tang ; Stevens v Peacock

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Insolvency Act 1986 - Articles : S-285
• Insolvency Act 1986 - Articles : S-306
• Insolvency Act 1986 - Articles : S-303

[See more]

• Insolvency Act 1986 - Articles : S-323
• Insolvency Act 1986 - Articles : S-287

REFERS TO

• Wilson v United Counties Bank Ltd
• New Quebrada Company v Carr
• Jackson v North Eastern Railway Company

[See more]

• Beckham v Drake
• Re a Debtor. ex parte Peak Hill Goldfield Ltd
• Re Flatau. ex parte Scotch Whisky Distillers Ltd
• Yeatman, Re, ex parte Yeatman
• Smith v Moffatt
• Spragg v Binkes
• Re Noble (A Bankrupt) ex parte The Bankrupt v The Official Receiver
• Smith (A Bankrupt), Re, ex parte Braintree District Council

APPLIES

• Benfield v Solomons
• Rochfort v Battersby
• Boaler v Power

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1993] 4 All ER 694

This document cites

• Re Noble (A Bankrupt) ex parte The Bankrupt v The Official Receiver
• Smith (A Bankrupt), Re, ex parte Braintree District Council
• Re Flatau. ex parte Scotch Whisky Distillers Ltd
• Boaler v Power
• Jackson v North Eastern Railway Company



See all quotations

• Yeatman, Re, ex parte Yeatman
• Wilson v United Counties Bank Ltd
• Smith v Moffatt
• New Quebrada Company v Carr
• Re a Debtor. ex parte Peak Hill Goldfield Ltd
• Benfield v Solomons
• Jackson v North Eastern Railway Company
• Spragg v Binkes
• Rochfort v Battersby
• Beckham v Drake
• Insolvency Act 1986