Hazell v Hazell

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Cracknell v Cracknell
• Falconer v Falconer

APPLIES

• Hargrave v Newton (formerly Hargrave)
• Gissing v Gissing

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17
• Married Women's Property Act 1882

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 1 All ER 923
• [1972] 1 WLR 301

CONSIDERED in

• Cheree Ann Warner v Roy William Warner
• Dorothy Emmeline Topham (wife of Eric Topham) (Plaintiff) Eric Topham (Defendant)
• Joaquina Arbos Edwards (Applicant) Vernon John Edwards (Respondent)

[See more]

• G. v D
• Bradshaw v Gumbs
• Alladin v Alladin
• Lewis v Lewis
• Whittaker v Whittaker
• Maitland v Maitland
• D v D
• Lettsome v Lettsome
• Maharaj v Maharaj
• Irene Joseph Claimant v Daniel Joseph Defendant [ECSC]
• Codrington v Codrington
• Hack v Rahieman
• Abbott v Abbott
• Haynes v Berry
• Joseph v Joseph
• Smith v Smith
• Edey v Edey
• Walcott v Walcott
• Joseph v Joseph

DISTINGUISHED in

• Richards v Dove

REFERRED in

• Shinh v Shinh
• Lau Choong Choo v Chou We Chuan
• Kowalczuk v Kowalczuk

[See more]

• Bernard v Josephs
• Bhoorasingh (Awel Tetsa) v Harry George Bhoorasingh
• Burns v Burns
• Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland
• Cooke v Head
• Wachtel v Wachtel

RELIED UPON in

• Judith Newman v Nigel Newman

CITED in

• Abdool Hack v Rahieman
• Fredrika Sonia Ewen v Errol Augustus Ewen
• McGill v Snodgrass

[See more]

• Cheryl Ann Smith Plaintiff v Claude Longheed Smith Defendant [ECSC]

FOLLOWED in

• Chan Yeong Keay v Yeo Mei Ling

This document cites

---

• Falconer v Falconer
• Cracknell v Cracknell
• Hargrave v Newton (formerly Hargrave)
• Gissing v Gissing
• Married Women's Property Act 1882