Hayward v Port of London Authority

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• DOCKS REGULATIONS, 1934, Dated March 5, 1934, Made by the Secretary of State UNDER SECTION 79 OF THE FACTORY AND WORKSHOP ACT, 1901 (1 EDW. 7. C. 22), IN RESPECT OF THE PROCESSES OF LOADING, UNLOADING, MOVING AND HANDLING GOODS IN, ON, OR AT ANY DOCK, WHARF, OR QUAY, AND THE PROCESSES OF LOADING, UNLOADING AND COALING ANY SHIP IN ANY DOCK, HARBOUR OR CANAL.

CITES

• Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd
• Franklin v The Gramophone Company Ltd
• London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton

[See more]

• Indermaur v Dames
• London and North Eastern Railway Company v Berriman
• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Procter
• Paris v Stepney Borough Council
• Tuck v Priester
• Walker v Mildland Railway Company
• Watts v Enfield Rolling Mills (Aluminium)
• London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1954] 2 Lloyd's Rep 363

CITED in

• Graves v J. and E.Hall, Ltd
• Wilczek v Gardiner and Tidy, Ltd
• Cowhig v Port of London Authority

This document cites

• London and North Eastern Railway Company v Berriman
• Paris v Stepney Borough Council
• Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Procter
• London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
• Watts v Enfield Rolling Mills (Aluminium)



See all quotations

• Franklin v The Gramophone Company Ltd
• Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd
• Tuck v Priester
• Indermaur v Dames
• London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
• Walker v Mildland Railway Company