Hayward v Chaloner

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Nicholson v England

APPLIES

• Moses v Lovegrove

CITES

• Cobb v Lane
• Smith v Lloyd and Others

DISTINGUISHES

• Leigh v Jack
• Williams Brothers Direct Supply Ltd v Raftery

CONSIDERS

• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-4
• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-9
• Limitation Act 1939 - Articles : S-10

[See more]

• Limitation Act 1939
• Administration of Estates Act 1925 - Articles : S-3
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-180

CONSIDERED in

• Lodge (T/a J D Lodge v City of Wakefield Metropolitan Council
• Clifford Frank Palfrey (Plaintiff) (Respondent) Edward Arthur Palfrey (Defendant) (Appellant)
• B.P. Properties Ltd v Mr W. Buckler

[See more]

• Barton v Church Commissioners for England
• John v Wyllie and John
• Warner et Al v Thomas et Al
• Babb-cadogan

FOLLOWED in

• Abdul Kareem; Anjalai Ammal and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1967] 3 WLR 1068
• [1967] 3 All ER 122
• [1968] 1 QB 107

CITED in

• Jacki Thomas Laughlin Mitchell v John Watkinson and Another
• Sauerzweig v Feeney

COMMENTED in

• Reuben John Applicant v Doris Wyllie First Respondent Cynthia John Second Respondent [ECSC]

REFERRED in

• Jessamine Investment Company v Schwartz

This document cites

---

• Williams Brothers Direct Supply Ltd v Raftery
• Cobb v Lane
• Nicholson v England
• Smith v Lloyd and Others
• Leigh v Jack



See all quotations

• Moses v Lovegrove
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Administration of Estates Act 1925
• Limitation Act 1939