Hasselblad (GB) Ltd v Orbinson

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

• Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd

REFERS TO

• Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No. 2)
• D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)
• R v Howell (Errol) (pet dis)

[See more]

• Lincoln v Daniels
• Munster v Lamb

APPLIES

• Practice Direction (Crime: Crown Court Business) (No. 3)
• R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Trapp v Mackie

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1985] 1 All ER 173
• [1985] 2 WLR 1
• [1985] QB 475

CONSIDERED in

• Westcott v Westcott
• Crehan v Inntrepreneur Pub Company (CPC)
• Iberian (UK) Ltd v BPB Industries Plc and Another

[See more]

• Scher v Policyholders Protection Board (No. 2)
• S. v Newham London Borough Council
• Malone v Fenlon
• Westcott v Westcott

REFERRED in

• Mann v O'neill
• BHLB Trustee Berhad v HSBC (Malaysia) Trustee Berhad
• Taylor v Director of the Serious Fraud Office

[See more]

• Heath v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
• Mahon v Rahn
• Fayed v Al-Tajir

FOLLOWED in

• Re Ontario Secs Commn
• Hong Lam Marine Pte Ltd and Another v Koh Chye Heng

CITED in

• Whittaker v Watler
• Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
• W and Westminster City Council and Anca Marks and James Thomas

DISTINGUISHED in

• Watler v Whittaker

RELIED UPON in

• Waple v Surrey County Council

This document cites

---

• D— D—(Married Woman) (Plaintiff (Appellant) The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (Defendants (Respondents)
• Trapp v Mackie
• Riddick v Thames Board Mills Ltd
• Lincoln v Daniels
• R v Howell (Errol) (pet dis)



See all quotations

• Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No. 2)
• R v Lewes Justices, ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Practice Direction (Crime: Crown Court Business) (No. 3)
• Munster v Lamb