Hartnell v Minister of Housing and Local Government

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Kent Justices, ex parte Crittenden

REFERS TO

• Hall & Company Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council
• Mixnam's Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban District Council
• Colonial Sugar Refining Company v Melbourne Harbour Trust Comrs

CONSIDERS

• Biss v Smallburgh Rural District Council

APPLIES

• East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission

FOLLOWS

• Guildford Rural District Council v Fortescue; Guildford Rural District Council v Penny

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] 3 All ER 130
• 61 LGR 602
• 127 JP 502

REFERRED in

• Crittenden (Warren Park) Ltd v Surrey County Council
• Biss v Smallburgh Rural District Council

CONSIDERED in

• Leighton & Newman Car Sales Ltd (Appellants) The Secretary of State for the Environment and and Others (Respondents)
• Crown Office List and Another (Appellant (Plaintiff) v North Norfolk District Council (Respondent
• Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd

[See more]

• Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs v Feakins and another

DISTINGUISHED in

• Esdell Caravan Parks Ltd v Hemel Hempstead Rural District Council
• Esdell Caravan Parks Ltd v Hemel Hempstead Rural District Council

FOLLOWED in

• Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Hartnell v Minister of Housing and Local Government

APPLIED in

• Westminster Bank Ltd v Beverley Borough Council

This document cites

---

• Biss v Smallburgh Rural District Council
• Guildford Rural District Council v Fortescue; Guildford Rural District Council v Penny
• Hall & Company Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council
• Mixnam's Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban District Council
• R v Kent Justices, ex parte Crittenden



See all quotations

• East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission
• Colonial Sugar Refining Company v Melbourne Harbour Trust Comrs