Harrow London Borough Council v Shah

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Sherras v De Rutzen

REFERS TO

• R v Sheppard
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Mousell Brothers v London and North Western Railway Company

[See more]

• Sherras v De Rutzen

APPLIES

• Sweet v Parsley
• Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Yee Chin Teo v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Chak Shing Mak v Attorney General of Hong Kong

CONSIDERS

• National Lottery Regulations 1994
• National Lottery etc. Act 1993 - Articles : S-13
• Homicide Act 1957 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Criminal Justice Act 1967 - Articles : S-8
• Licensing Act 1964 - Articles : S-169
• Intoxicating Substances (Supply) Act 1985 - Articles : S-1
• Firearms Act 1968 - Articles : S-24
• Children and Young Persons Act 1933 - Articles : S-7
• Children and Young Persons (Protection from Tobacco) Act 1991

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• The Independent, May 17, 1999
• [1999] 3 All ER 302
• [1999] 2 CrAppR 457

[See more]

• [1999] 163 JP 525
• The Independent, May 17, 1999

CONSIDERED in

• R v Muhamad
• Bhola (Customs and Excise Officer II) v Canserve Caribbean Ltd, Nurse and Gibbs

This document cites

• R v Sheppard
• Sweet v Parsley
• Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Mousell Brothers v London and North Western Railway Company



See all quotations

• Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Yee Chin Teo v Attorney General of Hong Kong; Chak Shing Mak v Attorney General of Hong Kong
• Sherras v De Rutzen
• Firearms Act 1968
• Children and Young Persons (Protection from Tobacco) Act 1991
• Intoxicating Substances (Supply) Act 1985
• Criminal Justice Act 1967
• Licensing Act 1964
• Homicide Act 1957
• Children and Young Persons Act 1933
• National Lottery Regulations 1994