Harrold v Plenty

Core Citations

REFERRED in

• Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2)Pty Ltd
• Jin Sen Hong (1971) Sdn Bhd v Khiing Sie Khuo (Syarikat Kion Hoong Cooking Oil Mills Sdn Bhd, Intervener)
• Chew Kian Kor; Gan Sin Tuan

[See more]

• Re EG Tan & Company (Pte)
• Re Lin Securities (Pte)
• Kong Swee Eng v Rolles Rudolf Jurgen August
• Chase Manhattan Bank NA v Wong Tui Sun and Others

FOLLOWED in

• Jin Sen Hong (1971) Sdn Bhd v Khiing Sie Khuo (Syarikat Kion Hoong Cooking Oil Mills Sdn Bhd, Intervener)
• Chase Manhattan Bank NA; Wong Tui San and Others v; Re EG Tan & Company (Pte)
• Perwira Habib Bank and Others; Seow Mui Kim

[See more]

• Re Lin Securities (Pte)
• Re City Securities Pte
• State Bank of India Singapore v Rainforest Trading Ltd
• PIC Property Ltd v Sing Eng (Pte) Ltd
• Damayanti Kantilal Doshi v Indian Bank
• Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd v Tan Mui Keow Claire and Another

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1901] 2 CH 314

DISTINGUISHED in

• Tibbetts v Nikfarjam

CONSIDERED in

• National Australia Bank Ltd v Clowes
• Sutherland v Compton Lot Ten Pty Ltd and Another
• United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand

[See more]

• Between Minsheng Vocational Education Company Ltd Appellant v (1) Leed Education Holding Ltd (2) National Education Holding Ltd (3) Hyde Education Holding Ltd Respondents
• Between Minsheng Vocational Education Company Ltd Appellant v (1) Leed Education Holding Ltd (2) National Education Holding Ltd (3) Hyde Education Holding Ltd Respondents
• Section 72 of the Arbitration Act, 2012 and Section 5 of the Foreign Arbitral Awards Enforcement Act (1997 Revision) and the Arbitration Proceedings Between Concorde Healthcare Ltd (as Claimant) and Chang Huan-Cheng and Brilliant Apex International Ltd (as Respondents) Seated in Hong Kong in Accordance with the 2013 HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules Case No.: HKIAC/A21248 Between Concorde Healthcare Ltd Plaintiff v Chang Huan-Cheng Brilliant Apex International Ltd Defendants
• Kathleen Jeanne Furlong(First Plaintiff and First Cross Defendant) v Wise & Young Pty Ltd (First Defendant, First Cross Claimant and Second Cross Defendant in the Second Cross Claim)