Harrington v Croydon Corporation

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson
• Langford Property Company Ltd v Batten

APPLIES

• Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson
• De Rothschild v Wing Rural District Council

DISTINGUISHES

• Langford Property Company Ltd v Batten

CONSIDERS

• Housing Act 1964 - Articles : S-14
• Housing Act 1964 - Articles : S-15
• Housing Act 1964 - Articles : S-16

[See more]

• Housing Act 1964 - Articles : S-27
• Housing Act 1964 - Articles : S-29
• Housing Act 1964
• House Purchase and Housing Act 1959
• Rent Act 1957 - Articles : S-5
• Housing Act 1961 - Articles : S-29

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1967] 3 All ER 929
• [1968] 1 QB 856
• [1968] 2 WLR 67

CONSIDERED in

• Patrick Nolan (Appellant v Leeds City Council (Respondent
• Ronald Legg (Applicant v Leominster District Council (Respondent
• Greta Myrie Branchett (Plaintiff) Appellant) v 1) Sydney Beaney and Others Respondents)

REFERRED in

• Branchett v Beaney
• F.F.F. Estates Ltd v Hackney London Borough Council

This document cites

• De Rothschild v Wing Rural District Council
• Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson
• Dudley and District Benefit Building Society v Emerson
• Langford Property Company Ltd v Batten
• Langford Property Company Ltd v Batten



See all quotations

• Housing Act 1961
• Housing Act 1964
• House Purchase and Housing Act 1959
• Rent Act 1957