Happe v Happe

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Ranson v Ranson

FOLLOWS

• G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal)

REFERS TO

• Morris v Morris

DISTINGUISHES

• Walker v Walker
• Roberts v Roberts

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Army Act 1955 - Articles : S-203

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-37
• Air Force Act 1955
• Air Force Act 1955 - Articles : S-203

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1990] 2 FLR 212
• [1991] 4 All ER 527
• [07/03/1990] TLR 2

[See more]

• [1991] 1 Fam CR 23
• [1990] 1 WLR 1282

CONSIDERED in

• Legrove v Legrove
• Turnquest v Turnquest
• Kalloo v Kalloo

REFERRED in

• Craig Laurie Barnard Petitioner/Respondent v Penelope Ann Barnard Nee Bird Respondent/Applicant [ECSC]

DISTINGUISHED in

• Cotgrave v Cotgrave

COMMENTED in

• Mary Aulina Joseph Plaintiff v Theophilas George Joseph Respondent [ECSC]

This document cites

---

• Ranson v Ranson
• G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal)
• Walker v Walker
• Roberts v Roberts
• Morris v Morris



See all quotations

• Army Act 1955
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Air Force Act 1955
• Matrimonial Causes Rules 1977
• Steamships Trading Company Limited v Chief Collector of Taxes [1986]