Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 10)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Eastman v R
• Roy v Prior
• Hargreaves v Bretherton

[See more]

• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby
• Ringrow Pty Ltd v Bp Australia Ltd
• Jamieson & Brugmans v R
• D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
• Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd
• Seaman v Netherclift
• Fitzjohn v Mackinder
• A v State of New South Wales
• Commonwealth of Australia v Griffiths and Another
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby
• Young and Another v Coupe & 4 Ors
• Roach and Others v Page and Others (No.11)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2008] NSWSC 611

CONSIDERED in

• Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 11)

This document cites

• Young and Another v Coupe & 4 Ors
• D'orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid
• Roach and Others v Page and Others (No.11)
• Commonwealth of Australia v Griffiths and Another
• A v State of New South Wales



See all quotations

• Watson v Jones or McEwan et è contra
• Roy v Prior
• Commonwealth v Griffiths
• Quick v Stoland Pty Ltd
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby
• Eastman v R
• Ringrow Pty Ltd v Bp Australia Ltd
• Dawkins v Lord Rokeby
• Jamieson & Brugmans v R
• Fitzjohn v Mackinder
• Seaman v Netherclift
• Hargreaves v Bretherton