Hamilton Finance Company Ltd v Coverley Westray Walbaum & Tosetti Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Bills of Exchange Act 1882 - Articles : S-46
• Stamp Act 1891
• Moneylenders Act 1927

[See more]

• Stamp Act 1891 - Articles : S-14
• Stamp Act 1891 - Articles : S-38
• Bills of Exchange Act 1882 - Articles : S-49
• Finance Act 1961 - Articles : S-33
• Bills of Exchange Act 1882 - Articles : S-45
• Hong v Choong Fah Rubber Manufactory

DISTINGUISHES

• Cundy v Marriott
• Plimley v Westley
• Gompertz v Bartlett

CITES

• Bell v Lever Bros Ltd
• Boissevain v Weil
• Brown v Watts

[See more]

• Buxton and Another v Cornish
• Cundy and Another against Marriott
• Hilton v Fairclough
• The King against The Inhabitants of the Township or Liberty of Kings Newton, in the County of Derby
• Jones and Others v Ryde and Another
• McGregor v Carr
• Pooley v Brown
• Sinclair v Brougham
• Smart v, Nokes
• Smith v Mullett
• Solle v Butcher
• Sweeting against Halse

APPLIES

• Gurney v Womersley
• Comptoir D'Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S.A. v Luis de Ridder Limitada (The Julia)
• Fengl v Fengl

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1969] 1 Lloyd's Rep 53

FOLLOWED in

• Agencies Service Bureau Sdn Bhd and Others; Malayan Banking Bhd

This document cites

• Bell v Lever Bros Ltd
• Comptoir D'Achat et de Vente du Boerenbond Belge S.A. v Luis de Ridder Limitada (The Julia)
• Plimley v Westley
• Hilton v Fairclough
• Cundy v Marriott



See all quotations

• Smart v, Nokes
• Gompertz v Bartlett
• Buxton and Another v Cornish
• Jones and Others v Ryde and Another
• Solle v Butcher
• Sweeting against Halse
• Hong v Choong Fah Rubber Manufactory
• Cundy and Another against Marriott
• Smith v Mullett
• Fengl v Fengl
• Gurney v Womersley
• Boissevain v Weil
• Brown v Watts
• Pooley v Brown
• Sinclair v Brougham
• McGregor v Carr
• The King against The Inhabitants of the Township or Liberty of Kings Newton, in the County of Derby