Hakim v. Accenture U.S. Pension Plan

This document cites

• Federal Cases - Lynn v. CSX Transp., Inc., 95-2240
• Federal Cases - Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform BD
• Federal Cases - Mein v. Carus Corp., 00-2618
• Federal Cases - Curran v. Kwon
• Federal Cases - Jacobs v. Xerox Corp. Long Term Disability Income



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - Romero v. Smithkline Beecham
• Federal Cases - Allen v. Aronson Furniture Co., 96 C 7051.
• Federal Cases - Crown, Cork Seal Company, Inc v. Parker
• Federal Cases - Jass v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Cowen v. Bank United of Texas, FSB
• Federal Cases - Foley v. City of Lafayette. Ind.
• Federal Cases - Koszola v. Board of Educ., City of Chicago
• Federal Cases - Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension Plan
• Federal Cases - Riordan v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
• Federal Cases - Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd v. Zenith Radio Corporation
• Federal Cases - Hurlic v. Southern California Gas Co.
• Federal Cases - Mondry v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.
• Federal Cases - Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc
• Federal Cases - Boeckman v. A.G. Edwards, Inc.
• Federal Cases - Normann v. Amphenol Corp.
• Federal Cases - Neuma Incorp. v. AMP Incorp.
• Federal Cases - Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan
• Federal Cases - Celotex Corporation v. Catrett
• Federal Cases - Culver v. City of Milwaukee
• Federal Cases - Midwest Imports, Ltd. v. Coval
• Federal Cases - Blickenstaff v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
• Federal Cases - Ciomber v. Cooperative Plus, Inc.
• US - Reference Stubs - Coverage
• US - Reference Stubs - Form and payment of benefits
• US - Reference Stubs - Civil enforcement
• US - Reference Stubs - Notice requirements for certain pension plan amendments significantly reducing the rate of future benefit accrual
• US - Reference Stubs - Benefit accrual requirements