Goyas Miah v Raza Miah

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Keen v Holland

CONSIDERS

• Law of Property Act 1925
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-53
• Law of Property Act 1925

REFERS TO

• RE Gorman (a Bankrupt) ex parte the Trustee of the Bankrupt v the Bankrupt and Another
• Stack v Dowden
• Lokumal (K.) & Sons (London) Ltd v Lotte Shipping Company Pte. Ltd (August Leonhardt)

[See more]

• Laskar v Laskar
• Yeoman's Row Management Ltd and another v Cobbe
• English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others
• Garth Geoffrey Weymont and Another v James Robert Place
• Jones v Kernott

CONSIDERED in

• Jordan v Goldspring
• Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Nobu Su / Hsin Chi Su (aka Su Hsin Chi; aka Nobu Morimoto)
• Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Nobu Su (aka Su Hsin Chi; aka Nobu Morimoto)

This document cites

• Garth Geoffrey Weymont and Another v James Robert Place
• Lokumal (K.) & Sons (London) Ltd v Lotte Shipping Company Pte. Ltd (August Leonhardt)
• Yeoman's Row Management Ltd and another v Cobbe
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others
• English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd



See all quotations

• Laskar v Laskar
• Stack v Dowden
• RE Gorman (a Bankrupt) ex parte the Trustee of the Bankrupt v the Bankrupt and Another
• Keen v Holland
• Law of Property Act 1925
• B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) (CAFCASS intervening)
• Jones v Kernott
• Re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof)