Gosling v Gosling

Core Citations

APPLIES

• Rowley v Rowley and Austin and French
• Mulhouse v Mulhouse
• Head v Cox

[See more]

• Nash v Nash; Fletcher v Fletcher; Short v Short and Barnett; Jowers v Jowers and Tuersley; Goldstone v Goldstone; Rubery v Rubery; Whatrup v Whatrup and Ansell; Silcox v Silcox and Power; Ingram v Ingram and Jackson; Girardet v Girardet and Stang

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-5
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1963
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1963 - Articles : S-4
• Legal Aid Act 1964

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1967] 2 All ER 510
• [1967] 2 WLR 1219
• [1968] P 1

REFERRED in

• Devas v Devas

APPLIED in

• Warren v Warren and Russell
• R v Bournemouth Crown Court, ex parte Weight

FOLLOWED in

• Rachael Mei Ling Ong and Another v Dato' Bruno Henry Almeida (as trustee of the estate of Ong Soon Hoe @ Patrick Ong)

This document cites

• Nash v Nash; Fletcher v Fletcher; Short v Short and Barnett; Jowers v Jowers and Tuersley; Goldstone v Goldstone; Rubery v Rubery; Whatrup v Whatrup and Ansell; Silcox v Silcox and Power; Ingram v Ingram and Jackson; Girardet v Girardet and Stang
• Rowley v Rowley and Austin and French
• Mulhouse v Mulhouse
• Head v Cox
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965



See all quotations

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Legal Aid Act 1964
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1963