Golden Gate Hill Dev. Co. v. Cnty. of Alameda

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHED in

• Mendocino Redwood Co. v. Cnty. of Mendocino

SUMMARIZED OPINION OF in

• Golden Gate Hill Development Co. v. County of Alameda

This document cites

• California - Friedland v. City of Long Beach
• California - County of Santa Clara v. Redevelopment Agency
• California - Zelig v. County of Los Angeles
• California - State Bd. of Equalization v. Superior Court
• California - Committee for Responsible Planning v. City of Indian Wells



See all quotations

• California - Hernandez v. City of Pomona
• California - Flying Dutchman v. San Francisco
• California - McLeod v. Vista Unified School Dist.
• California - Calif. Commerce Casino v. Schwarzenegger
• California - Moorpark Unified School Dist. v. Superior Court
• California - Katz v. Campbell Union High School Dist.
• California - Emid v. County of Santa Barbara
• California - In re Quantification Settlement Agreement Cases
• California - Borikas v. Alameda Unified Sch. Dist.
• California - City of Ontario v. Superior Court
• California - Kaatz v. City of Seaside
• US - Reference Stubs - Action or proceeding to validate, attack, review, etc. ordinance or resolution approved on or after January 1, 1986
• US - Reference Stubs - Refunds
• US - Reference Stubs - Authority to impose qualified special taxes; qualified special taxes defined
• US - Reference Stubs - Commencement of action
• US - Reference Stubs - Requirements of summons
• US - Reference Stubs - Jurisdiction of interested parties had by publication of summons
• US - Reference Stubs - Order for refund
• US - Reference Stubs - Mandamus or other remedy not precluded
• US - Reference Stubs - Action by public agency to determine validity of matter
• US - Reference Stubs - Interested person bringing action if no proceedings brought by public agency