Gilligan v Silke

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Landlord and Tenant Act, 1931
• Groome v Fodhla Printing Company Ltd

REFERS TO

• Re Young and Harston's Contract
• Phillips v Guardians South Dublin Union
• Wickham v Wickham

CITES

• Rawlings v Morgan
• Joyner v Weeks
• Inderwick v Leech

[See more]

• Davies v Underwood
• Hanson v Newman
• Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar
• Defries v Milne
• Manchester Bonded Warehouse Company v Carr
• Saner v Bilton

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 98 ILTR 161
• [1963] IR 1 (Digest)
• [1963] IR 1

CONSIDERED in

• St.CATHERINE'S PARISH v ALKIN

CLARIFIED in

• O'Reilly and Another v East Coast Cinemas Ltd

This document cites

• Margaret Rivets Case
• Re Young and Harston's Contract
• Bennett v Stone
• Bennett v Stone
• R v Downes



See all quotations

• Ellis v Dublin Corporation [Supreme Court.]
• West Ham Central Charity Board v East London Waterworks Company
• R v Senior
• Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar
• Joyner v Weeks
• Cunliffe v Goodman
• Attersoll v Stevens
• Haviland v Long. Dunn Trust Ltd, Third Parties
• Gallagher, Minister for Agriculture nment and Public Health and the Cork County Council
• Inderwick v Leech
• Manchester Bonded Warehouse Company v Carr
• Davies v Underwood
• Clow and Another v Brogden and Others
• Groome v Fodhla Printing Company Ltd
• Saner v Bilton
• Wickham v Wickham
• Hanson v Newman
• Davies v Davies
• Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe v McOscar
• Hardy v Fothergill
• Defries v Milne
• Executrix de Henry Hassel
• Jones v Herxheimer
• Rawlings v Morgan
• Elliott v Turner
• Re Young and Harston's Contract
• Phillips v Guardians South Dublin Union
• Hamilton v Black
• Landlord and Tenant Act, 1931