Giesbrecht v Prpick,

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• County of Stettler No 6 v Earl Marshall Trucking Ltd,
• Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34
• O'Kane v Lillqvist-O'Kane,

[See more]

• Anand v Anand,
• Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia v Engineer X,

CONSIDERED in

• Cody v Monaghan,
• Giesbrecht v Prpick,

This document cites

• Irwin v. Alberta Veterinary Medical Association, 2015 ABCA 176
• RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général), (1994) 164 N.R. 1 (SCC)
• Tingley et al. v. Wellington Insurance Co. et al., (2010) 296 N.S.R.(2d) 224 (CA)
• Moses v. Weninger et al., (2006) 380 A.R. 230 (CA)
• Kassian v. Hill, 2002 ABCA 140



See all quotations

• Ominayak et al. v. Norcen Energy Resources Ltd. et al., (1985) 58 A.R. 161 (CA)
• Merchants & Traders Assurance Co. et al. v. Paragon Capital Corp., [2002] A.R. Uned. 586 (CA)
• Pyne et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (Alta.), (2006) 401 A.R. 225 (CA)
• Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34
• May v 1986855 Alberta Ltd, 2018 ABCA 94
• Santoro v Bank of Montreal, 2018 ABCA 264
• Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 183
• Wang v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 175
• Sherman Estate v. Donovan, 2021 SCC 25
• Denis v Sauvageau, 2022 ABCA 166
• Chamczuk v Whelehan, 2022 ABCA 278