Georgia Dept. of Transp. v. Cannady

Core Citations

AFFIRMED in

• Department of Transp. v. Cannady

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Department of Transp. v. Cannady

REEMPLAZADA POR in

• Department of Transp. v. Cannady

This document cites

• Georgia - Brooks v. Cellin Mfg. Co., Inc.
• Georgia - Royals v. Georgia Peace Officer Standards and Training Council, A96A0796
• Georgia - Henley v. Mabry, 46811
• Georgia - General Motors Corp. v. Moseley
• Georgia - Stone v. Burell, 63258



See all quotations

• Georgia - Flowers v. Slash Pine Elec. Membership Corp., 45141
• Georgia - Continental Cas. Co. v. Union Camp Corp.
• Georgia - Jackson v. Meadows
• Georgia - King Cotton, Ltd. v. Powers
• Georgia - Carney v. JDN Const. Co.
• Georgia - Wright v. Dilbeck
• Georgia - Heath v. L.E. Schwartz & Sons, Inc.
• Georgia - Turner v. Taylor
• Georgia - Henderson v. Glen Oak, Inc.
• Georgia - Georgia Dept. of Human Resources v. Phillips
• Georgia - Studard v. Department of Transp., A95A1233
• Georgia - Patterson v. Lauderback, A93A2358
• Georgia - Medi-Clean Services, Inc. v. Hill
• Georgia - Ratliff v. CSX Transp., Inc., A95A1007
• Georgia - Stuckey's Carriage Inn v. Phillips
• Georgia - Wilson Foods Corp. v. Turner
• Georgia - Pierce v. Pierce
• Georgia - Henderson v. Glen Oak, Inc.
• Georgia - Evans v. Department of Transp., A96A2304
• Georgia - Ford Motor Co. v. Lee
• Georgia - Chastain v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
• Georgia - Georgia Southern & F. Ry. Co. v. Cartledge
• US - Reference Stubs - Action by resolution or by vote or order
• US - Reference Stubs - Interest on judgments
• US - Reference Stubs - Interest rate after judgment
• US - Reference Stubs - Punitive or exemplary damages or interest prior to judgment not allowed
• US - Reference Stubs - Limited waiver of sovereign immunity
• US - Reference Stubs - Trial of actions; limitations on amounts of damages; caps to limit total damages regardless of the type claimed
• US - Reference Stubs - OCGA § 5-5-24 Error In Instructions; Objection Required In Civil Cases; Requested Instructions; Review of Charges Involving Substantial Error