George Eric Edmondson (Respondent v Teesside Textiles Ltd (Appellant
Linked as:
Extract
George Eric Edmondson (Respondent v Teesside Textiles Ltd (Appellant
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
- Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
- Townley Mill Company (1919) Ltd v Oldham Assessment Committee
- General Rate Act 1967 - Articles : S-21
[See more]
REFERS TO
- London County Council v Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of Erith. Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of West Ham v London County Council. Assessment Committee of St. George's Union v London County Council
- Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC
- British Telecommunications (Formerly the Post Office) v Kennet District Council
REPORTED OPINION OF in
REFERRED in
This document cites
- Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
- British Telecommunications (Formerly the Post Office) v Kennet District Council
- Townley Mill Company (1919) Ltd v Oldham Assessment Committee
- London County Council v Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of Erith. Churchwardens and Overseers of Parish of West Ham v London County Council. Assessment Committee of St. George's Union v London County Council
- Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC