Generics [UK] Ltd t/a Mylan v Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd and Another

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Seager v Copydex Ltd
• Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No. 2)

[See more]

• Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc.
• Attorney General v Blake
• Bolkiah (Prince Jefri) v KPMG (A Firm)
• Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Paula Huesca de Crean

REFERS TO

• Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd
• Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd v Eli Lilly and Company Ltd
• Haberman and another v Jackel International Ltd

[See more]

• (1)Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (a company incorporated under the laws of New York, USA) (Appellant in Action 0931) (2) Bayer Pharma AG (a company incorporated under the laws of Germany) (Appellant in Action 0933) v Genentech Inc. (a company incorporated under the laws of Delaware, USA)
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
• Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
• Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices as
• British Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company Ltd v Braulik
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Company Ltd and Another
• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc

APPLIES

• Nottingham University v Fishel
• Herbert Morris, Ltd v Saxelby

CITES

• Unilever Plc v Chefaro Proprietaries Ltd

REVERSES

• Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Company Ltd and Another

CONSIDERS

• Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No. 2)
• Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard & Others

[See more]

• Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Paula Huesca De Crean
• Printers & Finishers Ltd v Holloway
• Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler
• Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc.
• Attorney-General v Blake (pet. all.)
• Balston v Headline Filters Ltd
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
• Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 - Articles : S-280
• Patents Act 1977
• Patents Act 1977
• Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

DISTINGUISHES

• His Royal Highness Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A Firm)

FOLLOWS

• Nordenfelt (Pauper) v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company, Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• D Jacobson & Sons v Crocs Inc.
• Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd v Product Specialities Inc. (t/a Final Touch)
• Generics (U.K.) Ltd trading as Mylan and Another v Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Third Party)

[See more]

• TQ Delta, LLC v Zyxel Communications Ltd
• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S. (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)
• Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Wyeth LLC
• Philip Morris Products, SA v Rai Strategic Holdings, Inc.
• D v P [SC Civ (Bda)]
• Norton (Waterford) Ltd T/A Teva Pharmaceuticals Ireland v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Company KG
• Anan Kasei Company Ltd v Neo Chemicals and Oxides Ltd (formerly Molycorp Chemicals and Oxides (Europe) Ltd)
• Customer Systems Plc v Ranson and Others
• Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Gilead Sciences Inc. and Others
• Synthon B.v v Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
• Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Others

CITED in

• Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/S
• Marshall & Barritt v A

REFERRED in

• Sandoz Ltd v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company
• Heraeus Noblelight Limtied v First Light Lamps Ltd
• Sandoz Ltd v Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company

[See more]

• Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Ono Pharmaceutical Company Ltd and Another
• Re Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Company Kg & Patents Acts
• Norton (Waterford) Ltd T/A Teva Pharmaceuticals Ireland v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Company KG
• Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v Novartis AG
• Akebia Therapeutics Inc. v Fibrogen, Inc.
• Alesco Risk Management Services Ltd v Bishopsgate Insurance Brokers Ltd

APPLIED in

• Gilead Sciences Inc. (a company registered in the US State of Delaware) v Nucana Plc

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2012] WLR D 169
• [2013] FSR 13
• [2013] Bus LR 777

This document cites

---

• Biogen Inc. v Medeva Plc
• Generics [UK] Ltd trading as Mylan v Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd and Another
• Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc.
• Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd
• Experience Hendrix LLC v PPX Enterprises Inc.



See all quotations

• Bolkiah (Prince Jefri) v KPMG (A Firm)
• Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Paula Huesca De Crean
• Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Paula Huesca de Crean
• Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices as
• Attorney-General v Blake (pet. all.)
• (1)Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (a company incorporated under the laws of New York, USA) (Appellant in Action 0931) (2) Bayer Pharma AG (a company incorporated under the laws of Germany) (Appellant in Action 0933) v Genentech Inc. (a company incorporated under the laws of Delaware, USA)
• Attorney General v Blake
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
• Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler
• Herbert Morris, Ltd v Saxelby
• Nordenfelt (Pauper) v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company, Ltd
• His Royal Highness Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A Firm)
• Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
• Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard & Others
• Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd v Eli Lilly and Company Ltd
• Seager v Copydex Ltd
• Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No. 2)
• British Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company Ltd v Braulik
• Unilever Plc v Chefaro Proprietaries Ltd
• Haberman and another v Jackel International Ltd
• Printers & Finishers Ltd v Holloway
• Crompton (Alfred) Amusement Machines Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No. 2)
• Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Company Ltd and Another
• Balston v Headline Filters Ltd
• Nottingham University v Fishel
• Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
• Patents Act 1977
• Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Conor Medsystems Inc.
• Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission.