GENDER SIDELINING AND THE PROBLEM OF UNACTIONABLE DISCRIMINATION.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 224 F.3d 33 (2nd Cir. 2000), 99-7979, Weinstock v Columbia Univ.
• Federal Cases - 357 F.Supp.2d 496 (D.Conn. 2005), Civ. A. 302CV1576, Kahn v. Fairfield University
• Federal Cases - 123 F.3d 490 (7th Cir. 1996), 95-3128, Jansen v. Packaging Corp. of America
• Federal Cases - 232 F.3d 546 (7th Cir. 2000), 99-3926, Bell et al v Environmental Protection Agency
• Federal Cases - 165 F.3d 405 (6th Cir. 1999), 97-1720, Allen v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 364 F.3d 789 (6th Cir. 2004), 00-6780, White v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe R. Co.
• Federal Cases - 496 F.3d 584 (6th Cir. 2007), 06-5750, Michael v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.
• Federal Cases - 617 F.3d 380 (6th Cir. 2010), 09-5839, Spees v. James Marine, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 714 F.Supp.2d 508 (E.D.Pa. 2010), C. A. 09-1456, Giordano v. Claudio
• Federal Cases - 594 F.3d 1202 (10th Cir. 2010), 08-1365, Johnson v. Weld County, Colorado
• Federal Cases - 117 F.Supp.2d 1043 (D.Kan. 2000), 99-1149, Sobba v. Pratt Community College & Area Vocational School
• Federal Cases - 232 F.Supp.2d 1244 (D.Kan. 2002), C. A. 01-2095, Berroth v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.
• Federal Cases - 947 F.Supp.2d 123 (D.D.C. 2013), C. A. 07-1033 (JDB), Johnson v. District of Columbia
• Federal Cases - 548 U.S. 53 (2006), 05-259, Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
• Federal Cases - 411 U.S. 792 (1973), 72-490, McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
• Gentry v Miller and Another