Gayler and Pope Ltd v Davies & Son

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Hendry v M'Dougall
• Macfarlane v Colam
• Snee v Durkie

[See more]

• Manton v Brocklebank
• Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Company Ltd
• Ruoff v Long & Company
• Tolhausen v Davies
• Martin v Stanborough
• Rylands and Another v Fletcher
• Holmes v Mather
• Ellis v Loftus Iron Company
• Simson v London General Omnibus Company
• Read v Edwards
• Cox v Burbridge
• Byrne v Boadle
• Hammack, Administratrix, v White
• Goodwyn v Cheveley
• Illidge v Goodwin

CONSIDERS

• Tilley v Ward
• Manzoni v Douglas

APPLIES

• River Wear Commissioners v Adamson and Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1924] 2 KB 75
• 40 TLR 590

CITED in

• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
• Deen v Davies
• Nickells v Melbourne Corporation

[See more]

• Haynes v G. Barwood and Son
• Pitcher v Martin
• Sandys v Harrison
• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)
• Searle v Wallbank

REFERRED in

• Wright v Callwood
• Akasah bin Ahad; Government of Malaysia and Another
• Gomberg v Smith

[See more]

• Fowler v Lanning
• Southport Corporation v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd (Inverpool.)

FOLLOWED in

• Parimala a/p Muthusamy and Others v Projek Lebuhraya Utara-Selatan
• Akasah bin Ahad; Government of Malaysia and Another

CONSIDERED in

• Queensland Stations Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

This document cites

• Rylands and Another v Fletcher
• Byrne v Boadle
• Holmes v Mather
• Tilley v Ward
• Goodwyn v Cheveley



See all quotations

• Hendry v M'Dougall
• Ellis v Loftus Iron Company
• Manton v Brocklebank
• Snee v Durkie
• Illidge v Goodwin
• Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Company Ltd
• Manzoni v Douglas
• River Wear Commissioners v Adamson and Others
• Hammack, Administratrix, v White
• Simson v London General Omnibus Company
• Read v Edwards
• Martin v Stanborough
• Cox v Burbridge
• Ruoff v Long & Company
• Macfarlane v Colam
• Tolhausen v Davies